I would have thought they could have digitally enhanced

those pics - noise reduction, comparison to background etc. - to give a lot more detail. Unless those are the enhanced pics.
Apparently modern planes materials are much more buoyant than the old ones.

Posted By: dennis moore on March 21st 2014 at 14:06:46

Message Thread

Those satellite images of possible objects (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 21, 13:39:58
- Some expert on the radio yesterday (General Chat) - sixthgo, Mar 21, 14:37:21
  - Not at 24m long its not! Shipping containers are either 20ft or 40ft! (n/m) (General Chat) - Kirrie, Mar 21, 14:56:53
- I would have thought they could have digitally enhanced (General Chat) - dennis moore, Mar 21, 14:06:46
  - That true, alot of composite materials, not just aluminium these days! (n/m) (General Chat) - Kirrie, Mar 21, 14:58:16
  - you'd think they'd make planes from as light a material as possible (n/m) (General Chat) - mr carra, Mar 21, 14:21:39
- I can't believe any part of a 777 that is that large (General Chat) - Hongky, Mar 21, 14:03:28
  - Surely the fuselage isn't buoyant? (n/m) (General Chat) - Hongky, Mar 21, 14:04:07
- You can't see anything really (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 21, 13:57:07
- I thought that too when I first saw them (General Chat) - mr carra, Mar 21, 13:55:17
- I thought I'd seen some blurb that other US sources had verified the images? (General Chat) - CWC, Mar 21, 13:55:11
- That must have better pictures!! (General Chat) - hoolahan, Mar 21, 13:47:38
- Got a link to the full res images? (n/m) (General Chat) - Larry Hagman, Mar 21, 13:43:01
  - Just ask one of your contacts at the pentagon (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 21, 13:58:02
    - He would need contacts at Ft Meade (n/m) (General Chat) - CWC, Mar 21, 14:38:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.