when they had 10 men for 80 minutes! Bizzare logic.
Posted By: phrankin on February 12th 2014 at 10:59:22
Message Thread
- Updated % chances of relegation (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 10:07:27
- Sunderland's remaining Away games are worse than ours (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 12, 10:15:21
- And their home games way better as a result (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 10:23:43
- they lost 2-0 at home to Hull so I see them as a banker for relegation with Cardiff. It's (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 12, 10:27:05
- when they had 10 men for 80 minutes! Bizzare logic. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 12, 10:59:22
- They played pretty much the entire game with 10 men (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 10:30:23
- they lost 2-0 at home to Hull so I see them as a banker for relegation with Cardiff. It's (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 12, 10:27:05
- And their home games way better as a result (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 10:23:43
- Ours should be lower than that with the run-in we have! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 12, 10:08:50
- You mean higher? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 10:19:16
- Based on? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Feb 12, 10:07:54
- The market odds (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 10:16:05
- Sunderland's remaining Away games are worse than ours (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 12, 10:15:21
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.