we haev plenty of players other teams would want - Wrath of the Barclay

we haev plenty of players other teams would want

just not signed anyone the top sides would want

Posted By: phrankin on January 31st 2014 at 16:33:44

Message Thread

Vaguely interesting table showing spend over past 5 years (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 31, 16:25:22
- That's not including this season, right? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 31, 16:37:10
  - can't be, which makes it BS as usual (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 31, 16:38:25
- Never realised Stoke were so spendy. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 31, 16:35:21
  - Pulis was one of the biggest spenders in *europe* while at Stoke. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jan 31, 16:38:47
- So only Palace have spent less than us (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 16:26:52
  - of course we haven't had to sell anyone of note either (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 31, 16:29:45
    - only because we haven't had anyone that other teams would want (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 16:31:08
      - we haev plenty of players other teams would want (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 31, 16:33:44
        
        we have now (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 16:35:12
        
        Lambert's side was very much championship (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 31, 16:36:15
        
        yes. We are only now Premiership quality. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jan 31, 17:21:24
        
        we area easily premiership quality... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 31, 18:05:37
  - Yep (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 31, 16:29:16
  - yup (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 31, 16:28:25
    - in a way that makes it even more impressive (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 16:30:36
- There Is No Number Thirteen (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 31, 16:26:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.