Fact is, it could always go either way

entirely depends who you get in. If it's someone like Gunn, or Terry Connor, it'll make things worse.

If it's a good manager, it'll make things better. This has been my whole argument with Mick Dennis all along, which he won't really acknowledge.

Posted By: duke of york on January 29th 2014 at 09:33:41

Message Thread

The argument that a new manager (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 29, 07:27:32
- results orientated....tons have stayed the same or done worse.... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 29, 14:32:39
- Fact is, it could always go either way (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 29, 09:33:41
- thing is, the argument that it does change things doesn't really hold water either (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 29, 07:57:58
  - We've been shit for 1.5 seasons (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 29, 08:56:55
    - 1.6 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 09:10:37
- I think Sunderland is a peculiar case (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 29, 07:44:40
- Honestly believe a new manager, provided they are even half decent (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 29, 07:39:12
- yeah but Fulham's change of manager has done nothing (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 29, 07:37:31
  - they sacked their manager and replaced him with a coach (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Jan 29, 07:45:39
    - righto, sorry it only applies to clubs who change a manager with a coach (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 29, 08:00:28
      - There have been studies on this.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 29, 14:34:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.