People are worried we will get bossed in midfield playing 4-4-2 against the better teams
Essentially those who don't like the 4-4-2 think the issue of us being defensive is down to tactics and mindset rather than 4-2-3-1 being an inherently negative formation.
The one thing 4-4-2 does mean though is we have two quality strikers on the pitch so hopefully tonight they can be clinical and the gamble will pay off!
Posted By: Jim on January 28th 2014 at 19:36:01
Message Thread
- Folks moan when we play 1 striker, now we playing 2 people aren't happy with 442? (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jan 28, 19:29:57
- 442 is a dead formation (NCFC) - dear prudence, Jan 28, 19:36:01
- People are worried we will get bossed in midfield playing 4-4-2 against the better teams (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 28, 19:36:01
- 4231 would be so much more effective with two wide men ion their good side. Gladly Pilks (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 28, 19:38:50
- Yes. He stays wide as well so we have a better shape (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 28, 19:41:38
- 4231 would be so much more effective with two wide men ion their good side. Gladly Pilks (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 28, 19:38:50
- NFN's (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 28, 19:35:59
- People always moan (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 28, 19:33:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.