If Gutierrez is a replacement for Pilkington it's very sad

We looked so much better last week with Pilkington on the pitch. More attacking than Gutierrez, better at crossing with his bad foot than Redmond with his good foot and a scoring record from open play that is better than any winger.

Gives us balance and would be in my starting eleven most weeks, why would ever sell for ?3m

Posted By: Hulk Rules on January 24th 2014 at 19:04:42

Message Thread

If Gutierrez is a replacement for Pilkington it's very sad (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 24, 19:04:42
- Whhaaaaa?? (NCFC) - TheGrump, Jan 24, 19:21:22
  - vmt (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 24, 19:40:15
    - Offers width, we look more balanced than having Gutierrez wandering in the middle. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 24, 20:08:01
      - Wandered into middle.... (NCFC) - doncoop, Jan 24, 22:22:27
  - Gives the side more balance. Gutierrez apart from one run was in it far less than snod. (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 24, 19:25:15
    - Snod's not far off that, with his 1st assist this season on Satdee... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 24, 19:28:35
      - I thought Gutierrez might play RB for us (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 24, 19:34:43
- He's not... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 24, 19:06:27
  - I think that we have the option to extend (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Jan 24, 19:29:58
    - We have the rest of this season.. (NCFC) - loz, Jan 24, 19:35:02
  - Not worth selling for 3m when we have to stay up though (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 24, 19:09:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.