that's one side of the story

on the other hand, he could play against us, create absolutely nothing and thereby enable US to come away with a 1-0 win.

Evidence of the past 12 months suggests he's at least as likely to have a sh*t game as a great one.

Seems rather odd that some people think that his inclusion in their team would automatically make them better not worse, because that certainly isn't true of our team (or he'd play more often)

Posted By: mr carra on January 23rd 2014 at 09:46:06

Message Thread

At least two posters below won't like this but I think this is a very fair summing up... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 23, 08:47:20
- That is a very long winded statement of the bleeding obvious (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 23, 09:02:19
  - It really wouldn't bother me where he went (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 23, 09:08:40
    - Well it should do! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Jan 23, 09:52:37
    - They don't need to transform them (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jan 23, 09:17:06
      - that's one side of the story (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 23, 09:46:06
        
        But that isn't the case... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 23, 09:49:50
        
        It might be the case (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 23, 10:09:22
        
        Indeed - let's say he played ahead of Weimann (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 23, 09:49:31
      - agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Jan 23, 09:19:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.