Why do people assume our next manager needs to be 'available'?
Lambert wasn't available.
Posted By: tim berry on January 15th 2014 at 00:09:38
Message Thread
- Why do people assume our next manager needs to be 'available'? (NCFC) - tim berry, Jan 15, 00:09:38
- a dumb defense against people wanting a managerial change (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 15, 00:12:02
- Yep the reasons to keep hoot (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 00:21:03
- The other end of spectrum actively chanting malky!?!? (NCFC) - walksie, Jan 15, 00:24:09
- shows we want change at least (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 00:25:34
- The other end of spectrum actively chanting malky!?!? (NCFC) - walksie, Jan 15, 00:24:09
- Yep the reasons to keep hoot (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 00:21:03
- Agree, also why do people only look at UK managers? (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 15, 00:11:51
- British managers are probably the worst place to look (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 15, 00:13:31
- No one british who's half decent is out of work (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 00:16:24
- British managers are probably the worst place to look (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 15, 00:13:31
- Cheaper innit (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 15, 00:10:35
- He was (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 00:10:22
- I mean that people assume our next manager needs to be currently out of a job. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Jan 15, 00:11:23
- a dumb defense against people wanting a managerial change (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 15, 00:12:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.