I think everyone thinks they're on thier uppers because of the Not Playing Darren Bent thi

ng. Which supposes that he actually did have an appearances based fee clause he was about to hit, and that that was why he wasnt playing. Neither of which might be true, unless there's been some confirmation of either.

So it's a bit of a reach on that basis. Whether there's more to it than that I don't know.

Posted By: Arizona Bay on January 10th 2014 at 14:00:29


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in