I think we would be better off with both Hoolahan and fox in the team
I think a big part of us struggling and generally being terrible to watch is that we don't press high up the pitch that often or retain the ball very well. Perhaps it's too simplistic on my account, but I think we did these things with Hoolahan playing off Holt, and I think in the right midfield Fox is a useful player in that he passes would help dictate the tempo of our game. You could even make an argument for players like Surman in there. Technically good, now completely cast aside.
The option hasn't been used at all by Hoot, he clearly favours a more "solid" approach. Just my opinion, but I think he has got it wrong.
Posted By: 51eve on January 8th 2014 at 01:01:34
Message Thread
- Gutted if Wes leaves (NCFC) - 51eve, Jan 8, 00:29:38
- Fox couldn't get in the Barnsley team. Good player but has limitations. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 8, 00:52:53
- Fox had mumps while at Barnsley (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 8, 01:02:48
- was it his Birthday? (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 8, 06:53:40
- I think we would be better off with both Hoolahan and fox in the team (NCFC) - 51eve, Jan 8, 01:01:34
- Fox had mumps while at Barnsley (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 8, 01:02:48
- Are teams allowed to swap players or must it be a (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 8, 00:41:53
- "And here comes Hoolahan. It could get worse for Ipswich, it has got worse!" (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Jan 8, 00:40:54
- Fox couldn't get in the Barnsley team. Good player but has limitations. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 8, 00:52:53
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.