sorry, meant to say we've become as dull as stoke under pulis.
if we were grinding out results i wouldnt mind so much, but its clear that there are games we could have gone on to win had we changed things and we settled for a point, theres too many games were by we're losing and we dont change things... and its dull to watch.
Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on January 2nd 2014 at 10:10:48
Message Thread
- Why are Norwich so boring? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 2, 09:21:37
- We aren't (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 2, 10:27:55
- We are a bit, Pants. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 2, 10:31:05
- which would make us mostly not (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 2, 10:33:37
- Yes, that's probably right. Mostly not boring, but a bit boring. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 2, 10:35:13
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 2, 10:35:08
- which would make us mostly not (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 2, 10:33:37
- We are a bit, Pants. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 2, 10:31:05
- am i the only one that thinks a tight relegation battle can be thrilling? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 2, 10:15:23
- Yes, the situation is quite nail-biting (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 10:52:58
- I agree. At the moment every game is important (n/m) (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Jan 2, 10:36:14
- "ambition free" in his match report (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 2, 09:38:04
- no. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 2, 09:50:02
- I read ambition in it's positive sense in the context of that game (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 2, 11:12:36
- ah ok - I read it as 'as a club' over the season (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 2, 11:31:09
- We have McNally's ambition to stay in the Prem & gradually progress (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 2, 11:37:37
- said to someone yesterday, I am sure mcnasty's brief to manager is (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 2, 11:58:54
- We have McNally's ambition to stay in the Prem & gradually progress (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 2, 11:37:37
- ah ok - I read it as 'as a club' over the season (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 2, 11:31:09
- I read ambition in it's positive sense in the context of that game (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 2, 11:12:36
- I like the comments on that match report, btw (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 2, 09:45:17
- no. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 2, 09:50:02
- thats a bit rich from Jacob Steinberg who's a West Ham fan (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 2, 09:26:51
- Doubt he has much influence on West Ham's style of play (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Jan 2, 09:41:13
- Spot on there (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 2, 09:23:59
- 100% agreed.......think we'll stay up - obviously main priority, but we've become stoke (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 2, 09:32:48
- We haven't become Stoke under Pulis at all. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 2, 09:35:37
- sorry, meant to say we've become as dull as stoke under pulis. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 2, 10:10:48
- Stoke under Pulis created chances. We are far worse. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 2, 09:40:58
- I wouldn't mind us being boring if there was an obvious plan/style of play (that worked) (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Jan 2, 09:48:28
- We haven't become Stoke under Pulis at all. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 2, 09:35:37
- 100% agreed.......think we'll stay up - obviously main priority, but we've become stoke (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 2, 09:32:48
- We aren't (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 2, 10:27:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.