That's ridiculously illogical

Why make it 1 off 3 instead of 20 off 20, which looks much more positive? You're entitled to your opinion, but I just don't see how this epitomises how we're sleepwalking towards relegation. Today was a decent enough point.

Posted By: King on January 1st 2014 at 17:34:52

Message Thread

Sleepwalking to relegation under Hughton (NCFC) - dear prudence, Jan 1, 17:25:19
- That's a really good way (NCFC) - BillySteele, Jan 1, 17:28:28
  - ELmander already on. Played for a point. Losing today would have been catastrophic (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 1, 17:31:39
- How can you possibly construe an away point vs one of your rivals (NCFC) - King, Jan 1, 17:26:51
  - because it was a game we should try to win? (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Jan 1, 17:41:58
  - Because... (NCFC) - dear prudence, Jan 1, 17:31:42
    - That's ridiculously illogical (NCFC) - King, Jan 1, 17:34:52
  - You've inadvertently confirmed the level you see us at now (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Jan 1, 17:30:22
    - That's what pees me off. Sunderland are clearly shit, West Ham have no strikers (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 1, 17:33:33
      - Exactly (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Jan 1, 17:35:56
        
        and along comes January, One astute signing and any of the clubs below us (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 1, 17:39:32
  - Because it follows two home defeats and (NCFC) - BillySteele, Jan 1, 17:29:31

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.