Not necessarily.

If we lose at Palace I think there's a good chance he will go, they backed him heavily in the summer and he's produced worse results than last season, that's hardly likely to make them want to give him a load more money to spend.

Posted By: LeicesterYellow on December 30th 2013 at 20:12:11

Message Thread

Hughton is not going to be sacked now. He will backed with funds in January... (NCFC) - jimbo, Dec 30, 17:11:34
- Not necessarily. (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 30, 20:12:11
- Dsagree (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Dec 30, 18:43:32
- He could quite easierly be sack after palace. Personally I dont think this will happen. If (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, Dec 30, 17:30:22
  - if here and board gives funds in january then not to..... (n/m) (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, Dec 30, 17:44:56
  - Lets face it - Palace away is always a loss or a draw (NCFC) - inutero, Dec 30, 17:36:59
- January window will be dead like all the others (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 30, 17:25:35
  - Edp (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 30, 17:26:19
    - Erm... lol. Yep. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 30, 17:26:32
      - ? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 30, 17:27:53
- We need a real nasty piece of shit in charge apparently (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 17:17:35
  - have you ever had a conversation with a professional (NCFC) - bobble, Dec 30, 17:22:00
    - But the second the form is bad, we'll have a Di Canio (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 17:26:44
      - god help us! that was so bad I felt embarrassed (NCFC) - bobble, Dec 30, 17:33:32
        
        Nice guy = 1 week in control, measured 2nd week = limp, weak, no one listens (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 18:32:15
- the board have only had 1 moment of backbone. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Dec 30, 17:14:20
- To be fair, no-one can be sure (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 30, 17:13:44

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.