well, that may have worked but may not have done
when Wes came on, Fulham took more control of the game.
I think the bigger issue is why we have a lack of cover in such an important position (central midfield), particularly when Tettey is so injury prone.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on December 26th 2013 at 17:45:45
Message Thread
- victims of 4-4-2 today (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 26, 17:40:45
- So why wasn't it changed? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:41:10
- we only have two fit central midfielders (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:41:44
- Could have brought Wes into the middle and gone 4-3-3/4-5-1 (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:43:31
- Wes in the middle, no, but on the wing coming in yes (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:47:30
- He's played most of his games for us in the middle (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:50:21
- I'm yhinking he may be a bit on the light side, seems to get knocked off the ball easily? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:56:20
- Yes he does get knocked off the ball sometimes. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 18:03:36
- I'm yhinking he may be a bit on the light side, seems to get knocked off the ball easily? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:56:20
- Why not, he did ok there the last couple of season. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:50:10
- He's played most of his games for us in the middle (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:50:21
- well, that may have worked but may not have done (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:45:45
- Tettey was barely even first choice ahead of Johnson last season (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:47:21
- don't think you can call Hughton cowardly after the subs today (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:51:08
- why not... like for like subs, why am I meant to be impressed (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:52:44
- they obviously weren't cowardly subs (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:56:34
- why not... like for like subs, why am I meant to be impressed (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:52:44
- don't think you can call Hughton cowardly after the subs today (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:51:08
- There is that (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:46:52
- wes was excellent on the right against Palace though (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:50:05
- Fer created and scored a goal from the left wing a few weeks ago (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:51:12
- wes was excellent on the right against Palace though (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:50:05
- Tettey was barely even first choice ahead of Johnson last season (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:47:21
- Wes in the middle, no, but on the wing coming in yes (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:47:30
- So Wes in the hole wasn't an option? Bizarre, it has worked in the past. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:42:45
- Could have brought Wes into the middle and gone 4-3-3/4-5-1 (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:43:31
- we only have two fit central midfielders (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:41:44
- So why wasn't it changed? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:41:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.