can today's pefromance really be Hughtons fault?

played 442 which most people on here want to see.
Played Hooper with Emander then Wolfie. played Redmond and Snodgrass who are attacking players.
player Ollsonn and Whittaker who are attacking full backs. so no lack of attacking intent from Hughton.

problem was too many players had a terrible and unusually bad performance, Bassong, Fer, Snodgrass were very poor , snoddy, Whitaker + Olsson were little better. we know all those players can play much better than they did today

Posted By: Kar1 on December 26th 2013 at 17:40:20

Message Thread

can today's pefromance really be Hughtons fault? (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:40:20
- Yes. (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 26, 19:56:06
- first goal can't really be blamed on him (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 26, 17:47:38
  - poor coaching (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 18:10:34
- Its not a one off though. We play awful football every week (NCFC) - Ben, Dec 26, 17:47:14
  - Totally agree with that. 100% (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 26, 17:50:20
- Of course, his players, his formations, his tactics, his responsibility (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:42:04
  - I was thinking that far too many players played below their usual standard (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:44:21
    - Know what you mean but ultimately his responsibility (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 26, 17:44:54
      - yes, he needed to change things round at half time (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 26, 17:48:49
- He buys, trains and picks the players (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 26, 17:41:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.