Solid half, but we should be in front
Sunderland really are bad, and we are playing ok, just haven't taken our chances.
Not sure Snods should have gone straight back into the side - he seems off the pace.
Hooper looks like a very good striker.
We can win this OTBC!
Posted By: Kev on December 21st 2013 at 15:50:39
Message Thread
- Solid half, but we should be in front (NCFC) - Kev, Dec 21, 15:50:39
- Sunderland had good opportunities too, even up half for me (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 21, 15:56:55
- Loving Hooper's movement and touch. Always making himself available (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Dec 21, 15:53:41
- Hoops is a PROPER striker (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 21, 15:53:22
- Holt. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 21, 15:54:41
- Not really in the same class as Hooper in my opinion though (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 21, 15:59:49
- Holt was the real deal, just got on a bit and was played as a lone front man (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 21, 16:03:31
- Not really in the same class as Hooper in my opinion though (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 21, 15:59:49
- Bilbo Baggins (Wayne Biggins) (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 21, 15:53:51
- Robert Rosario: The Master Motivator, Mentor & Friend......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 21, 16:02:09
- Holt. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 21, 15:54:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.