Agreed, but thought the point of including him was to try and stop Suarez
First and third goals might have been avoided if someone was told to sit.
Looked like all three had license to get forward if possible.
Missing Tettey for that role.
Posted By: roedtonowhere on December 5th 2013 at 17:55:33
Message Thread
- Why was Bradders not playing in front of the back four last night? (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 5, 17:42:48
- Bradley Johnson was our third most forward player last night (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 17:50:42
- Agreed, but thought the point of including him was to try and stop Suarez (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 5, 17:55:33
- Oh - ^^^ ANOTHER new poster ^^^ (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 5, 17:50:23
- Combo of Glen and Talking Heads (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 5, 17:51:54
- Just SCC intut (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 17:58:37
- Surely The Hydra is more likely (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 5, 18:00:34
- Just SCC intut (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 17:58:37
- Combo of Glen and Talking Heads (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 5, 17:51:54
- Bradley Johnson was our third most forward player last night (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 17:50:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.