Fair enough, though there is a more relevant point of discussion
it isn't just about why we are so sh*t but whether we in fact are. Your post just assumes we are, but as I pointed out elsewhere we have won our last two home games (and should have won the one before after totally dominating it). We also dominated and won our last away game against a team in the bottom half of the table.
Quite clearly there are things we could be doing better but do we really qualify as "sh*t"?? That seems to be to be setting a ridiculously high standard that the team will hardly ever be able to meet.
Posted By: mr carra on December 5th 2013 at 14:23:55
Message Thread
- I'm not an "inner" exactly (NCFC) - paulg, Dec 5, 12:36:59
- fair enough (NCFC) - dear prudence, Dec 5, 13:36:51
- and the injuries (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 12:44:59
- Yes constantly changing the defence very lucky (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 5, 12:47:46
- Lambert made his own luck regarding injuries (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 12:47:20
- Lambert involved the squad (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 13:37:39
- Players seemed generally fitter under Lambert (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:08:45
- Don't recall Holt looking particularly fit (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 13:15:00
- LOL (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 5, 13:19:20
- nobody's laughing (n/m) (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:29:30
- some of the stuff on here is laughable, so fill your boots (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 5, 13:37:04
- at the football - no, at you - yes (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 13:35:30
- You think fitness is not issue, I think it may be, whats funny (n/m) (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:39:31
- because you have no evidence for it whatsoever (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 13:46:28
- Its not a case, its a point of discussion. (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:57:26
- Fair enough, though there is a more relevant point of discussion (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 14:23:55
- No I think shit just about covers it. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Dec 5, 19:35:49
- Fair enough, though there is a more relevant point of discussion (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 14:23:55
- Its not a case, its a point of discussion. (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:57:26
- because you have no evidence for it whatsoever (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 13:46:28
- You think fitness is not issue, I think it may be, whats funny (n/m) (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:39:31
- nobody's laughing (n/m) (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Dec 5, 13:29:30
- LOL (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 5, 13:19:20
- yep that seals it - Holt looked fitter under Lambert (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 13:13:09
- Don't recall Holt looking particularly fit (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 13:15:00
- Lambert had to deal with Whitbread (calf) and biscuit knees Ayala (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Dec 5, 12:51:36
- amazing looking back at that 'championship standard' defense (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 13:38:47
- Ayala was shit whenever I saw him. And Lambert bought both IIRC (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 5, 13:38:35
- Ayala was hopeless (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 5, 14:42:34
- agree with most of that (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 5, 12:39:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.