As posted below I think that

as much as we hate to admit it he has been pretty much right all along. We barely did win a game in the second half of the season, we did sign good players in the summer, the tactics and negative approach are poor and bringing Murphy on in that scenario was a bit strange.

If you ignore the talksport hyperbole about "worst ever prem team" which was designed to hook us all in his basic views on us and Hughton over the last year have been correct.

Posted By: Jim on November 5th 2013 at 10:36:21

Message Thread

Adrian Durham has a point re Murphy substitution (n/m) (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, Nov 5, 10:13:24
- cock (n/m) (NCFC) - yellowman, Nov 5, 10:57:21
- As posted below I think that (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 10:36:21
  - I was on hold for half an hour to be on with him yesterday. (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 5, 10:50:06
- He was the only one who looked like he was trying. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 5, 10:30:29
  - He also looked as "ready" as the rest of them (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 10:33:42
    - Yep. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 5, 10:35:45
      - One year (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 10:37:51
        
        And Chris Llewellyn. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 5, 10:40:28
        
        And Adrian (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 10:40:53
- nothing wrong with giving the lad a chance (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 5, 10:19:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.