Sack him. No sentiment in football, results business
Posted By: CB41 on October 30th 2013 at 12:39:55
Message Thread
- The more I read on here, the more frustrated and worried I get..... (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 30, 10:27:38
- If he's sacked and things get worse, they'll have their reasons for that too (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:31:09
- They'll be calling for the head of Pulis after 4 games (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:39:04
- I do love this assumption that the next guy can just do this with his eyes shut (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:41:54
- It's the excitement of the thought of searching for a new manager that get the majority (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:48:40
- They get like this because it's possible we'll get a result against West Ham (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:53:21
- who is 'them'? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 30, 10:53:56
- tick tock... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 30, 11:12:01
- who is 'them'? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 30, 10:53:56
- sigh (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 30, 10:49:45
- Maybe the Board have the belief that he will turn it around (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:52:23
- erm?! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 10:49:30
- or do you mean hiring shit managers (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 10:51:04
- judging by your comments you class Hughton as a shit manager (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:55:40
- not good enough for the premier league imo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 10:57:54
- McNally hired him (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 30, 12:36:22
- mcnally fucked up (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 12:37:36
- Sack him. No sentiment in football, results business (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 30, 12:39:55
- mcnally fucked up (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 12:37:36
- McNally hired him (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 30, 12:36:22
- not good enough for the premier league imo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 10:57:54
- judging by your comments you class Hughton as a shit manager (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:55:40
- or do you mean hiring shit managers (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 10:51:04
- They get like this because it's possible we'll get a result against West Ham (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:53:21
- It's the excitement of the thought of searching for a new manager that get the majority (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:48:40
- again, let's try and ground this in a bit of reality here (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 30, 10:40:49
- correct (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Oct 30, 10:47:45
- This worry though, based on 8 clubs around us all on the same points (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:42:37
- see below (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 30, 10:46:24
- That's an issue about scoring though, not one about replacing a manager because (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:50:46
- Like the 1 point we've taken off Villa, Cardiff and Hull? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 30, 10:52:35
- 2 being at home as well (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 30, 11:00:32
- Like the 1 point we've taken off Villa, Cardiff and Hull? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 30, 10:52:35
- That's an issue about scoring though, not one about replacing a manager because (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:50:46
- see below (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 30, 10:46:24
- I do love this assumption that the next guy can just do this with his eyes shut (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:41:54
- They'll be calling for the head of Pulis after 4 games (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 30, 10:39:04
- If he's sacked and things get worse, they'll have their reasons for that too (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 10:31:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.