That's how I see it too. If we'd beaten Southampton last season because of Holt's dive

For the pen, how would that have been any better than what happened on Saturday?

One form of cheating is OK, the other isn't? Nonsense. And the ref made up a new rule on Saturday too!

Posted By: thebigfeller on October 28th 2013 at 16:29:40

Message Thread

For the record (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 28, 16:20:21
- ^^^ not a gentleman ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 28, 16:41:56
  - Modern football is not a gentleman's game. Or to put it another way: (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 28, 16:44:53
    - always wonder how the whole rugby eye-gouging thing fits with that (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 28, 17:27:45
- Wow (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 16:32:01
- 3 - hasnt hughton denied this? (n/m) (NCFC) - matt in london, Oct 28, 16:32:00
  - I've just spotted that. Interesting. I therefore withdraw 3 (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 28, 16:41:07
- Fair enough. You've said how I feel. It was the same official who bought Sakho's dive (NCFC) - pants, Oct 28, 16:26:03
  - That's how I see it too. If we'd beaten Southampton last season because of Holt's dive (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 28, 16:29:40
    - The difference is so obvious (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 28, 16:46:57
      - The oppo knocked it out of play having injured our player, and to waste time (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 28, 16:49:20
- 3,4 and 5 awful (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 28, 16:21:17
  - vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 16:24:10
    - and 1 and 2 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 16:37:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.