Yep - that was the reason I would guess

not that it was warranted. people always assume putting extra forwards on is the answer when of course there's far more to be considered than just that.

Posted By: South_West_Canary on October 27th 2013 at 14:35:30

Message Thread

I don't get all this Elmander, Hooper debate.... (NCFC) - Barclay_Steve, Oct 27, 14:25:45
- would guess it was that we took a striker off (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 27, 14:28:13
- Booing was for changing striker for striker. Simple as that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 27, 14:28:07
  - Yep - that was the reason I would guess (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 14:35:30
    - indeed hughton decided to put a worse one on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 14:40:51
      - on what basis.... (NCFC) - Barclay_Steve, Oct 27, 15:24:54
        
        whatever Hughton does, SCC will find a way to suggest it was wrong or idiotic (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 27, 21:20:39
        
        maybe elmander could use all his experience (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 15:26:26
      - Sometimes a change can work - it was worth a go. Hooper had had a fair old time & (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 14:45:54
- you missed old and cheat in that bio (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 14:27:41
  - Was he describing Holt then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 27, 14:28:40
    - nope hucks (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 14:30:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.