Why is no one mentioning the tactical changes that saw
Pilkington and Snods playing narrow and almost in the hole behind Hooper, basically doubling up on Medel and led to us over running them at the end of the first half.
I saw no reason for tactical changes this afternoon we were battering them. The reason it fell apart in the second part of the second half was due to lack of movement...no one was available for a pass. (even then we didn't resort to aimless hoofs)
Posted By: Maillot Jaune on October 26th 2013 at 21:19:28
Message Thread
- Why is no one mentioning the tactical changes that saw (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Oct 26, 21:19:28
- They went 4-2-2-2 that was the important tactical change 2nd half (n/m) (NCFC) - curva nord, Oct 26, 21:24:11
- They had 11 behind the ball every time we had it, good defending and difficult to break (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Oct 26, 21:30:39
- welsh brought on extra midfielder (n/m) (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, Oct 26, 21:23:49
- Agree, that's why I think Hoots was right taking Hopper off, he was blowing out his arse (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Oct 26, 21:23:48
- They went 4-2-2-2 that was the important tactical change 2nd half (n/m) (NCFC) - curva nord, Oct 26, 21:24:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.