the 31 shots thing is bollocks though

Got to look at actual chances we created, not how many shots we had from 30 yards that flew into the stand to make the stats look better.

Just saying '31 shots' means naff all.

Posted By: wolfio on October 26th 2013 at 18:36:51

Message Thread

I have one question (NCFC) - King, Oct 26, 18:28:24
- We should've spent the Sky/BT money on bigger goals (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Oct 26, 18:45:20
- the 31 shots thing is bollocks though (NCFC) - wolfio, Oct 26, 18:36:51
  - 21 of them missed the target (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 18:41:12
- sign better players.... Coach the side to create better chances. (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 18:32:37
- use better players for longer? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 18:30:33
- Spend ?13 million on strikers who can finish, work harder on finishing in training (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Oct 26, 18:29:52
  - So you would only have us buy proven PL strikers? (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Oct 26, 18:36:32
    - No, but I would have certainly looked at trying to bring in one (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Oct 26, 18:42:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.