Just seen Anglia News,,,
The penalty incident, for the ref not to give it must have meant that the defender played the ball, which he clearly did not.
So then it would have been a backpass and so why not an indirect freekick??
Feel even more cheated now.
Posted By: Mr_Biff on November 23rd 2005 at 13:31:36
Message Thread
- Just seen Anglia News,,, (NCFC) - Mr_Biff, Nov 23, 13:31:36
- how did you feel getting a pen at reading? or having an offside goal against plymouth (NCFC) - pants, Nov 23, 13:40:11
- We shouldn't have to moan about not being given penalties (NCFC) - DDiM, Nov 23, 13:32:34
- Agreed, why I haven't got on about it (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 23, 13:36:18
- but they were no better..nm (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr_Biff, Nov 23, 13:51:01
- Agreed, why I haven't got on about it (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 23, 13:36:18
- eh? If he got the ball then it was a tackle, not a back-pass. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 23, 13:32:20
- no, if he got the ball it would have been to play it back.. nm (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr_Biff, Nov 23, 13:34:15
- you are genuinely wrong on this - it was an attempted tackle (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 23, 13:39:28
- just looked again and agree,,,however (NCFC) - Mr_Biff, Nov 23, 13:46:33
- you are genuinely wrong on this - it was an attempted tackle (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 23, 13:39:28
- no, if he got the ball it would have been to play it back.. nm (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr_Biff, Nov 23, 13:34:15
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.