I disagree....

4-4-2

-----------------Ward*-------------
Helveg*--Shacks--Flem---Drury
--------------------------------------
new-----new------Safri----Hucks
--------------------------------------
----------Leon------Ashton-------

Bench

Gallacher
Jonson
Charlton
Hendo/Jarvo
Svenny

*denotes players who should be replaced of necessary. E.g. shoul ward be crap, or helveg leave. Otherwise however I think they should be left as they are unless a the right player at the right price come along. Theres no point buying players who aren't any better when these guys are up to the task in this division. Would be good if we had a malky-esque defender if only for attacking and defending set pieces.

Hucks only left us wide open against saints in particular because he wasn't fully fit.

OTBC

Posted By: SimonOTBC on May 22nd 2005 at 02:17:39

Message Thread

FAO oh arr (NCFC) - oregonandy, May 22, 01:23:08
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 22, 01:36:40
  - Why not/ (n/m) (NCFC) - oregonandy, May 22, 01:54:09
    - A couple of reasons for me... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 22, 01:59:49
      - We Absolutely Cannot (NCFC) - oregonandy, May 22, 02:01:58
        
        In the First Division/Championship ... (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, May 22, 02:05:03
        
        I Repeat (NCFC) - oregonandy, May 22, 02:07:49
        
        I disagree.... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 22, 02:17:39
        
        Should have * flem as well (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 22, 02:18:19

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.