no point in getting rid unless we replaced him with someone better

I think he's a pretty good reserve. Much better than we've had in ages - any decent player will take a chance when it's offered to them.

I think we'll keep him until Janurary and then replace him if we can, unless he comes in and does well at some point.

Posted By: scruffy on September 3rd 2013 at 11:09:11

Message Thread

So what now for Becchio, I wonder? (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 3, 10:18:07
- no point in getting rid unless we replaced him with someone better (NCFC) - scruffy, Sep 3, 11:09:11
- Might be happy to be a bench warmer for a big pay cheque. (NCFC) - Since1902, Sep 3, 10:21:58
  - Simple (NCFC) - south, Sep 3, 10:23:20
    - We should replace him though. Can we loan in ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 3, 10:30:53
      - No loans in, only loans out. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Sep 3, 11:00:47
      - Martin or Vaughan (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Sep 3, 10:35:26
    - ah, yes ... (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 3, 10:23:56
- I'm sure he'd be fine if we were constantly putting decent balls into the box (NCFC) - mrleelee, Sep 3, 10:20:27
  - why does he pick RvW then? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 3, 11:05:12
  - Wingers that cut inside all the time doesn't help... (NCFC) - Since1902, Sep 3, 10:24:06
- Hughton didn't bring him on on Sat when RVW was struggling and we needed some strength. (NCFC) - lurd, Sep 3, 10:20:25
  - I think RVW is fine, I would have kept him on (NCFC) - scruffy, Sep 3, 11:00:57
  - I think you're probably right (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 3, 10:23:30
- Keep the bench warm.... Until hoops is back (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Sep 3, 10:18:54

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.