penalties
For me our claim for handball in the first half was actually stronger than theirs.
The ball was really smashed at BJ and his hands didn't move towards the ball at all. You could claim he was making himself big to block the ball but on the other hand he might have just been helping himself jump. Certainly seen them given but not stonewall.
For our one their guy not only clearly moves his hands to where the ball is going he then pushes the ball away. Two movements. Was very close so grounds for not giving it but wasn't hit anywhere near as hard as the one at BJ.
The snoddy one was blatant, no arguments and a disgrace given what we conceded at hull last week.
Posted By: Kangol Canary on September 1st 2013 at 09:35:43
Message Thread
- penalties (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Sep 1, 09:35:43
- It was a clear pen to them... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 1, 10:46:44
- if snodgrass went down naturally he might get a bit more sympathy from refs (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 1, 11:01:22
- deffo a pen against BJ, and Snod being felled (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 1, 10:49:13
- Agree with that (NCFC) - Clean Shirt, Sep 1, 10:43:49
- thought theirs was definitely a pen but didn't think our one was (NCFC) - earlydoors, Sep 1, 09:44:07
- agree on all counts (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 1, 09:47:55
- It was a clear pen to them... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 1, 10:46:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.