Agree. Unless Becchio is on his way
Posted By: grimsbycanary3 on August 5th 2013 at 21:32:03
Message Thread
- Toivonen still possible? (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Aug 5, 21:12:18
- Think Toivonen fits better into our system.. (NCFC) - Canary Marshall, Aug 5, 22:23:45
- Much rather see the Quag sign (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 5, 21:52:38
- Or what he really means... (NCFC) - mrleelee, Aug 5, 21:36:50
- that quote is from last week anyway, silly sky (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Aug 5, 21:31:33
- Gone on too long IMO... Initially I was happy for him to take his time (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Aug 5, 21:15:00
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Aug 5, 21:15:27
- Surely we wouldn't want him and quag? (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Aug 5, 21:13:07
- I think Hoots wants both and a quality central defender (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 5, 21:22:49
- Don't think we could justify both really (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Aug 5, 21:27:27
- Agree. Unless Becchio is on his way (n/m) (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Aug 5, 21:32:03
- we didn't really want Becchio in the first place. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 5, 21:50:32
- Toivonen is more of a Wes type (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 5, 21:33:52
- But does play up front too (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Aug 5, 21:40:40
- I would be happy with that (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 5, 21:42:05
- But does play up front too (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Aug 5, 21:40:40
- Agree. Unless Becchio is on his way (n/m) (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Aug 5, 21:32:03
- Don't think we could justify both really (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Aug 5, 21:27:27
- I think Hoots wants both and a quality central defender (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 5, 21:22:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.