It's ok accomodating them both
But if 1 is playing in an unfamiliar position then it's a waste of time
Posted By: Darren Eadie on July 27th 2013 at 00:24:04
Message Thread
- 442 or not to 442? (NCFC) - Molmans Custard, Jul 26, 23:54:34
- Same formation as last year (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jul 26, 23:59:01
- I don't see why RVW would play in that position (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jul 27, 00:00:11
- Allows you to play both Hooper and Ricky same time (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jul 27, 00:17:10
- It's ok accomodating them both (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jul 27, 00:24:04
- Allows you to play both Hooper and Ricky same time (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jul 27, 00:17:10
- I don't see why RVW would play in that position (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jul 27, 00:00:11
- RVW will obviously play (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jul 26, 23:57:22
- agreed (NCFC) - Molmans Custard, Jul 27, 00:01:51
- Same formation as last year (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jul 26, 23:59:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.