Would we really buy Hoopers and Quags?

I hope I am wrong, but it all seems very un-norwich. Settling for second best and lacking ambition have always been a problem here. I just can't see it to be fair.

Again, I hope I am wrong.

Posted By: ChengdeCanary on July 25th 2013 at 11:31:33

Message Thread

Would we really buy Hoopers and Quags? (NCFC) - ChengdeCanary, Jul 25, 11:31:33
- Not sure how we would keep 3 strikers happy (NCFC) - Ben, Jul 25, 11:39:57
  - One is Becchio (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Jul 25, 11:44:13
    - becchio would be the 4th (NCFC) - Monty Peculiar, Jul 25, 12:21:16
    - Only beacause Tettey didn't pass to him (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jul 25, 11:45:51
- Yes but McNally is on board now (NCFC) - ingi, Jul 25, 11:38:34
- It is very un-norwich. It's very The Norwich. We are The Norwich now (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Jul 25, 11:32:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.