thirdin line behind RVW and Quag wouldn't be so bad. He'd get a fair bit of pitch time

especially with injuries/suspensions.
Becchio on the other hand probably wouldn't be seen outside the league cup

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on July 24th 2013 at 23:20:17

Message Thread

We're back in, ?10m deep, for Quagilarella apparently. PLEASE make this happen. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 24, 23:03:29
- Gone in up to the naval. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jul 24, 23:20:49
- any link to this (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Jul 24, 23:20:13
  - ... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 24, 23:23:45
- Makes sense why we seem to be letting Hooper go to QPR (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jul 24, 23:05:47
  - I want both. We need two strikers. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 24, 23:08:26
    - agree (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jul 24, 23:10:09
      - But would Hooper be happy on the bench? (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jul 24, 23:12:09
        
        I reckon he would. Fair call though. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 24, 23:16:37
        
        Does Quagliarella play off the front In the Wes role? (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jul 24, 23:21:04
        
        I think if we were to play two strikers with a 'Wes role' it'd be RVW in that role (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 24, 23:25:06
        
        thirdin line behind RVW and Quag wouldn't be so bad. He'd get a fair bit of pitch time (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 24, 23:20:17
        
        Amazing competition for places too (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jul 24, 23:23:36
        
        and exactly what we need if we really do want to move up a notch in the hierarchy (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 24, 23:24:34
        
        Totally (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jul 24, 23:25:39
- That's almost (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jul 24, 23:04:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.