Strange decision.
Why not just "let him go". He's under-23 still so we'd still be due a fee somehow? Or does this just ensure we get a nominal fee out of it come the end of the year and him being 23? Seems a waste of our money really.
Posted By: trafford_canary on June 18th 2013 at 12:15:39
Message Thread
- Rudd (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jun 18, 12:04:54
- To 2015 (n/m) (NCFC) - trustsec, Jun 18, 12:28:27
- Strange decision. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jun 18, 12:15:39
- possible recall clause if we get hit by injuries? (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 18, 14:39:51
- Import (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jun 18, 12:19:02
- Important to keep him if the rumours re steer going.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 18, 12:19:43
- Doesn't this also clear space for Steer to be 3rd choice? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jun 18, 12:21:01
- Important to keep him if the rumours re steer going.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 18, 12:19:43
- Good for him. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 18, 12:07:39
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.