Didn't those figures refer to the amount spent on wages as a percentage of turnover
Rather than just the amount spent on wages? Don't think we were the actual lowest spenders.
Unless I've missed it were they also not for the previous season under Lambert? I'd imagine that figure changed further last season with several players signing new deals and established Prem players like Seb and Turner coming in.
Posted By: Mr Brownstone on June 15th 2013 at 06:58:41
Message Thread
- Now that it's known we are the cheapest salary in the prem. (NCFC) - pants, Jun 15, 00:10:19
- Turnover: 12th in league (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 15, 11:01:05
- Didn't those figures refer to the amount spent on wages as a percentage of turnover (NCFC) - Mr Brownstone, Jun 15, 06:58:41
- Or were you referring to the transfer fee thing rather than salary? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Brownstone, Jun 15, 07:01:17
- WW2 but useful in making the comparisons with Club accounts (NCFC) - trustsec, Jun 15, 07:46:39
- Swansea had the lowest wage bill according to that (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 15, 11:01:25
- WW2 but useful in making the comparisons with Club accounts (NCFC) - trustsec, Jun 15, 07:46:39
- Or were you referring to the transfer fee thing rather than salary? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Brownstone, Jun 15, 07:01:17
- No, been saying the same thing for ages........... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 15, 01:41:18
- Well the players will know that now too... (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 15, 00:48:36
- And so will clubs sniffing around Snoddy, Ruddy, Pilks and Bassong! (n/m) (NCFC) - mrleelee, Jun 15, 01:29:33
- Not really, give the board credit for getting a mid table bunch of players for cheap money (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jun 15, 00:40:53
- Me too, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jun 15, 00:31:20
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.