not that i'm moaning but just thinking...
it seems hoops and davies are off elsewhere and ola isn't overly interested... i get ola's lact of interest but surely if we really wanted hoops and davies we'd have them?
Posted By: hucksmyman on June 14th 2013 at 18:48:41
Message Thread
- not that i'm moaning but just thinking... (NCFC) - hucksmyman, Jun 14, 18:48:41
- I can't see us being in for Hooper if he's going to Reading (n/m) (NCFC) - mrleelee, Jun 14, 19:08:42
- I was amazed we were after him in the first place... (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 14, 19:45:33
- maybe we wanted a striker in Jan, couldnt get van winky so tried Hooper (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 14, 18:51:41
- That's what McNasty told a guy I sit near at the football. RVW was the one. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Jun 14, 19:15:05
- He's bound to say that anyway. (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jun 14, 19:19:38
- Maybe so but rvw is a class above Hoops (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jun 14, 19:29:07
- indeed (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jun 14, 19:39:06
- Maybe so but rvw is a class above Hoops (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jun 14, 19:29:07
- He's bound to say that anyway. (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jun 14, 19:19:38
- also not that tilted about missing out on hooper. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 14, 18:53:23
- Yes although Adkins... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 14, 19:01:23
- Adkins is a worse manager than Hoots, so who gives a fuck (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 14, 20:01:04
- Yes although Adkins... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 14, 19:01:23
- That's what McNasty told a guy I sit near at the football. RVW was the one. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Jun 14, 19:15:05
- I can't see us being in for Hooper if he's going to Reading (n/m) (NCFC) - mrleelee, Jun 14, 19:08:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.