In what way is he better than Bennett?
Why spend ?2.5m + on a player who wouldn't massively improve us. Snod and Pilks would still be first choice
Posted By: Duck on June 7th 2013 at 12:00:59
Message Thread
- Kebe?? FFS - we're meant to be looking to improve (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jun 7, 10:40:59
- He is a very good player, best at Reading and certainly better than Bennett, maybe Pilks (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jun 7, 10:49:47
- He'd have been a great signing two years ago (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 7, 11:07:20
- Not massively injury prone. Av 27 games a year. Far better than Bennett (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jun 7, 11:23:47
- In what way is he better than Bennett? (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 7, 12:00:59
- Not massively injury prone. Av 27 games a year. Far better than Bennett (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jun 7, 11:23:47
- Averaged about 27 games a season in his 5.5 years at Reading (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jun 7, 10:56:57
- He'd have been a great signing two years ago (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 7, 11:07:20
- He is a very good player, best at Reading and certainly better than Bennett, maybe Pilks (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jun 7, 10:49:47
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.