To be fair though SCC..
Even you had us going down on 41 points a week or so ago! Happy to be wrong anyhow
Posted By: loz on May 14th 2013 at 21:17:26
Message Thread
- So, 40 points weren't needed after all... surprise surprise... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 14, 21:14:32
- Safe since Reading (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, May 14, 21:30:56
- No-one loves a smuggypants, Lee ;) (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, May 14, 21:25:33
- I never said that 40 wouldn't be needed, tbf... (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 14, 21:27:02
- I thought after Villa game 39 would be enough (NCFC) - Klobo04, May 14, 21:18:46
- the stats didn't lie again (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 14, 21:19:29
- At what point did we have 35 points? (NCFC) - Duck, May 14, 21:16:27
- Well, pants did tell us... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 14, 21:16:50
- I think that's besides the point (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, May 14, 21:15:27
- What point? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 14, 21:16:22
- yep loz owes me an apology (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 14, 21:15:06
- To be fair though SCC.. (NCFC) - loz, May 14, 21:17:26
- with a pessimistic predictor (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 14, 21:18:00
- thought it went down to gd anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 14, 21:18:24
- with a pessimistic predictor (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 14, 21:18:00
- To be fair though SCC.. (NCFC) - loz, May 14, 21:17:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.