true, but i wouldn't call it a diamond...

i think that with safri holding and spraying the ball out wide and with the two very fit (i presume etuhu is a fit lad, he hhas that reputation) central midfielders, i see it less of a diamond and more of a combo of 4-3-3 and 4-5-1, due to safs reluctance to go forward we would always have 4 behind the ball and probs one of hughes or etuhu, therefore 5. In a normal diamond that worthy has played before, he put too much pressure on midfielders to get forward, wrong players in the wrong positions and not enough players behind the ball, i'd love to see him try it.

Posted By: vstevenson on November 11th 2005 at 17:29:34

Message Thread

The team in my view: (NCFC) - vstevenson, Nov 11, 17:19:28
- you have to doubt (NCFC) - T 07, Nov 11, 17:45:24
  - yeh u got valid point, but have we got anything better? (n/m) (NCFC) - vstevenson, Nov 11, 17:52:53
    - thats where my argument crumples I'm afraid (n/m) (NCFC) - T 07, Nov 11, 18:04:16
- every time worthy (NCFC) - maisey, Nov 11, 17:25:37
  - true, but i wouldn't call it a diamond... (NCFC) - vstevenson, Nov 11, 17:29:34
    - how can you play a diamond....... (NCFC) - fareastcanary, Nov 11, 18:48:51
      - a) its not a diamond, b), c) and d) irrelevent, cos its not a diamond... (n/m) (NCFC) - vstevenson, Nov 11, 20:35:24
    - similar to the formation chelsea play (NCFC) - maisey, Nov 11, 17:36:18
      - obviously uncomparable in terms of ability but... (NCFC) - vstevenson, Nov 11, 17:39:26
        
        isn't it xmas tree time? (NCFC) - T 07, Nov 11, 17:48:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.