England's chances wasn't it?
Posted By: Huge Small on April 7th 2013 at 19:28:51
Message Thread
- History Question (Other Football) - SeattleSounders, Apr 7, 19:00:15
- only 93/94 when moving from 22 to 20 teams I think (n/m) (Other Football) - pat_abb, Apr 7, 19:04:40
- 94/95 even. When we went down (n/m) (Other Football) - pat_abb, Apr 7, 19:06:12
- Also in the mid 80's Division One was reduced from 22 to 20 clubs over 2 seasons (Other Football) - R T Chase, Apr 7, 19:15:48
- interesting way of doing the playoffs back then (Other Football) - pat_abb, Apr 7, 19:27:52
- I recall the reason for going down to 20 (Other Football) - SeattleSounders, Apr 7, 19:25:47
- England's chances wasn't it? (n/m) (Other Football) - Huge Small, Apr 7, 19:28:51
- Might be wrong (Other Football) - SeattleSounders, Apr 7, 19:30:14
- Quite possibly (Other Football) - Huge Small, Apr 7, 19:34:28
- Might be wrong (Other Football) - SeattleSounders, Apr 7, 19:30:14
- England's chances wasn't it? (n/m) (Other Football) - Huge Small, Apr 7, 19:28:51
- Also in the mid 80's Division One was reduced from 22 to 20 clubs over 2 seasons (Other Football) - R T Chase, Apr 7, 19:15:48
- 94/95 even. When we went down (n/m) (Other Football) - pat_abb, Apr 7, 19:06:12
- no (n/m) (Other Football) - Huge Small, Apr 7, 19:01:18
- only 93/94 when moving from 22 to 20 teams I think (n/m) (Other Football) - pat_abb, Apr 7, 19:04:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.