I didn't think we were *totally* over-run for that 35 minute spell
but we certainly didn't deserve the goal.
I thought Swansea did a good job of slowing the game down. I'm not sure if we were unwilling or unable to change that (maybe a bit of both).
I just found it interesting that when Swansea had to up the tempo it played in to our hands and we had our best spell of the game. It suggests to me that Swansea were good at controlling the game when they needed to get what they wanted (an end to their losing run for much of it).
The last 15 had me flummuxed. Holt could have at least done a bit of closing down.
Posted By: Huge Small on April 6th 2013 at 18:53:18
Message Thread
- Anyway, on the game itself (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 6, 18:32:13
- That's exactly how I saw it .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Apr 6, 19:25:40
- I didn't think we were *totally* over-run for that 35 minute spell (NCFC) - Huge Small, Apr 6, 18:53:18
- agreed, especially with the last bit. Until he came on we were closing them down quite wel (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 6, 20:09:11
- tbf he took Wes off because he was injured (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Apr 6, 18:37:04
- he wasn't, said it was tactical (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Apr 6, 18:41:19
- It was .. Wes asked the bench to come off shortly before the goal (n/m) (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Apr 6, 19:37:10
- FUrry muff, didnt hear post match. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Apr 6, 19:05:46
- Was he? Didn't notice that (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 6, 18:40:00
- He signaled that he wanted to go off, but then carried on (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 6, 18:44:47
- he wasn't, said it was tactical (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Apr 6, 18:41:19
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.