Their form says they are. We needed to win that game 100 times more than they did
Yet we didn't. To draw some kind of parallel: in 94/5, Liverpool won the League Cup. In April, Villa played them, and beat them. West Ham played them, and hammered them. And we played them... and lost to them, because we no longer had the quality to beat anyone not called Ipswich Town.
Now, in 2013, we might well no longer have the quality to beat anyone not called Reading - but even if we do beat them, will that be enough...?
Posted By: thebigfeller on April 6th 2013 at 17:29:07
Message Thread
- So who is going to the first to post that Swansea had 132% possession and use that as a (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 17:16:20
- They were much the better, more dangerous side (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Apr 6, 17:23:30
- They were clearly a long, long way from the beach. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 17:35:16
- they didn't look like they were on the beach (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 6, 17:24:53
- Their form says they are. We needed to win that game 100 times more than they did (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Apr 6, 17:29:07
- I think it will. 4 points from reading and villa will be enough (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 6, 17:40:53
- we usually come out to set our stall out and defend (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 6, 17:28:17
- Their form says they are. We needed to win that game 100 times more than they did (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Apr 6, 17:29:07
- They did (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 6, 17:17:26
- Yes, but they have that almost every game whether they win or lose (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 17:19:42
- They were much the better, more dangerous side (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Apr 6, 17:23:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.