Is it bad? Take it Wigwam didn't play
Posted By: Dandy Highburyman on April 6th 2013 at 16:55:18
Message Thread
- Still wouldn't recommend looking at the table (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 16:54:17
- Up one place; one less game. Not horrendous! (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Apr 6, 16:55:57
- agreed, will only look bad if Sunderland and Wigan win tomorrow (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 6, 16:57:32
- It will still look bad. Just not absolutely sphincter squeezingly frightful (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 17:00:46
- better be prepared, it'll very probably look worse next week (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 6, 17:12:23
- It will still look bad. Just not absolutely sphincter squeezingly frightful (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 17:00:46
- agreed, will only look bad if Sunderland and Wigan win tomorrow (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 6, 16:57:32
- Big if but if Wigan and Sunderland to win games in hand we'd be 2 pts off (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 16:55:32
- Is it bad? Take it Wigwam didn't play (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Apr 6, 16:55:18
- away at QPR, Mackems at Chelsea (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 6, 16:55:49
- as long as sunderland and Wigan dont win tomorrow it is fine (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 6, 16:55:18
- Up one place; one less game. Not horrendous! (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Apr 6, 16:55:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.