I've never seen either Murphy, but they'd have to be truly precocious to be considered - Wrath of the Barclay

I've never seen either Murphy, but they'd have to be truly precocious to be considered

for a Prem game, and if they are, I think they'd have been seen vs Peterboro or Luton? Dunno.

Posted By: Sugbad The Bad on March 26th 2013 at 12:15:03

Message Thread

So presume this Jackson move is bollox? (NCFC) - Old Splat, Mar 26, 12:08:26
- it's reported in the star that's it (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 26, 12:12:35
- if true, it's an odd bit of business (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Mar 26, 12:09:33
  - save on wages tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 26, 12:13:04
    - inconsequential against struggling for lack of forwards in event of injury crisis? (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Mar 26, 12:15:41
      - recall surely (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 26, 12:16:44
        
        total recall? (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Mar 26, 12:19:16
        
        yes i was going to type that (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 26, 12:21:38
  - If we put one of the Murphy twins on the bench instead (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 26, 12:12:17
    - Jackson has not played much tbf (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 26, 12:20:30
      - Exactly (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 26, 12:28:55
      - you have to be very good to cut it in the prem (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 26, 12:22:28
    - I've never seen either Murphy, but they'd have to be truly precocious to be considered (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Mar 26, 12:15:03
      - should be sent on loan first (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 26, 12:15:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.