hate to say it but sending off was correct
Bunn's arms are up (therefore mitigating against accidental....imagine if it had been sunderland keeper) and by handling it he prevented a clear goal scoring opportunity. Harsh but fair...ish. Other decisions were ridiculous...
Posted By: Joe Strimmer on March 17th 2013 at 21:46:44
Message Thread
- hate to say it but sending off was correct (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 17, 21:46:44
- May have struck his arm, but doesn't there have to be intent (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Mar 17, 21:51:49
- its actually the only foul that has to have an element of intent (n/m) (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 17, 22:00:22
- hence man u bleating about the champsleague red is (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 17, 22:02:35
- i think if your arms are up or away from the side of your body (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 17, 21:59:43
- its actually the only foul that has to have an element of intent (n/m) (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 17, 22:00:22
- Didn't stop a goal scoring opportunity with his hand (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 17, 21:50:29
- at most it?s a yellow card and that?s if you think there?s some intent there (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 17, 22:14:43
- arms in position to control the ball if chest fails... red card. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 17, 22:30:51
- at most it?s a yellow card and that?s if you think there?s some intent there (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 17, 22:14:43
- I don't think it was correct but can see why he gave it (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 17, 21:49:40
- May have struck his arm, but doesn't there have to be intent (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Mar 17, 21:51:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.