Thanks for clarifying that 42.4 points is 42.

We wouldn't have got that otherwise.

Posted By: Arizona Bay on March 17th 2013 at 18:27:11

Message Thread

First the Prediction table of Tilt based on form (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:14:29
- Now my final computer predictions based on strength of schedule (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:24:42
  - much better effort (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 17, 18:27:14
  - Thanks for clarifying that 42.4 points is 42. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Mar 17, 18:27:11
    - Yebbut some hilarious japester might have said "how do get 0.2 points??!!" (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 17, 18:30:59
    - If only my predictions were as reliable as your monkey tilting. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:30:03
- Teams often pick up markedly different form.. (NCFC) - loz, Mar 17, 18:23:59
  - some better....... some worse.........yet........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:28:20
    - I would be flabbergasted if 36 is enough.. (NCFC) - loz, Mar 17, 18:30:37
      - Were you "flabbergasted" last season when it didn't take 40 points (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:36:59
        
        Less teams down there with low totals .. (NCFC) - loz, Mar 17, 18:39:59
        
        And I didn't say.. (NCFC) - loz, Mar 17, 18:41:26
        
        *fewer* (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Mar 17, 18:40:40
      - I think we'll win. They'll be going for the win and that favours us (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 17, 18:34:57
- Was there a correct Table of Tilt last season ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 17, 18:23:18
  - they were all correct...... they predicted Tilt.....Tilt was delivered..... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:39:26
- Current form or season long? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 17, 18:16:58
  - so smaller samples are better than bigger ones.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:25:37
    - Credibility vs Reliability (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 17, 18:29:28
      - Is this a question, statement or random tiltage of a man from Essex? (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:35:01
    - yes, when the larger sample is utterly useless (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 17, 18:28:26
      - You are totally wrong...... here is the proof. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:33:17
  - *Fairly* useless? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Mar 17, 18:24:51
    - Thanks for your reaction........ (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:26:06
  - Funnily enough, you're not the first to say that... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 17, 18:19:21
    - 2nd....... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 17, 18:26:29
    - TY its an honor (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 17, 18:19:47

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.