Probably really need Wigan to lose a couple..
Then we should be confident of being home and dry. Win tomorrow and we may be there. Thing that worries me is we know those bastards can go on long winning runs 6 from 7 last year and they have a game in hand
Posted By: loz on March 16th 2013 at 17:05:00
Message Thread
- Lambert aside, the Villa win was the best result for us, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 16, 17:02:07
- why?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 17:43:34
- why not? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 16, 17:54:10
- qpr got no chance of catching us (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 18:30:57
- why not? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 16, 17:54:10
- Probably really need Wigan to lose a couple.. (NCFC) - loz, Mar 16, 17:05:00
- And you can seriously see us winning tomorrow? (NCFC) - Nice Guy Eddie, Mar 16, 17:17:15
- Due an away win mate (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 16, 17:18:38
- Indeed we are pal it's been a while. (n/m) (NCFC) - Nice Guy Eddie, Mar 16, 17:23:15
- Sunderland are gash, in terrible form and MacClean is out I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 16, 17:22:14
- Due an away win mate (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 16, 17:18:38
- They've got the FA Cup distraction this year though. (NCFC) - bird table, Mar 16, 17:06:28
- And you can seriously see us winning tomorrow? (NCFC) - Nice Guy Eddie, Mar 16, 17:17:15
- why?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 17:43:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.