A leicester, Forest. Good team trying to come thrtough or just promoted.
He's our top earner and not worth a w**k this season. Looked awful a lot more than he's looked good. I know he's not a 4-5-1 striker but he is muscled off the ball easy, doesn't win nearly as much in the hair, has had chances and fluffed them, isn't linking up nearly as well. Can't make a case for keeping him lately
Posted By: Alan on March 9th 2013 at 15:44:02
Message Thread
- I'd let Holt go in the summer. . . (NCFC) - Alan, Mar 9, 15:37:15
- Does Holt benefit when we, as a team, have more possession? (NCFC) - Dahab_Canary, Mar 9, 15:51:13
- Nothing sticks to Holt like it use to, Players still run off him (NCFC) - Alan, Mar 9, 16:06:40
- FFS he has no service....... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 9, 15:40:05
- I'm not basing one game on this opinion. (NCFC) - Alan, Mar 9, 15:46:25
- That's rubbish (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Mar 9, 15:44:15
- Indeed (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Mar 9, 15:42:06
- I'd have taken money for him last summer (n/m) (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Mar 9, 15:39:02
- Who would take him?? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Mar 9, 15:38:47
- A leicester, Forest. Good team trying to come thrtough or just promoted. (NCFC) - Alan, Mar 9, 15:44:02
- Does Holt benefit when we, as a team, have more possession? (NCFC) - Dahab_Canary, Mar 9, 15:51:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.