Martin was post foul
Posted By: phrankin on March 2nd 2013 at 17:21:49
Message Thread
- lol (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:17:23
- Howson, Martin, Seb, ..? (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 2, 17:20:38
- Martin was post foul (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 2, 17:21:49
- Howson blocked, Martin didn't count because of Holt's foul (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 2, 17:21:46
- except that is not actually true today is it. I certainly remember us having a shot. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Mar 2, 17:19:56
- Howson had a shot which went wide, Bassong had a header saved (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 2, 17:19:25
- hence my lol - it was a bbc tweet - shocking journalism (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:20:31
- nice back tracking (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Mar 2, 17:26:00
- Howson's was blocked according to BBC (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 2, 17:20:08
- i thought he shanked it way wide (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:20:51
- The only Howson shot they have is the following: (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 2, 17:21:35
- maybe it was that then (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:22:47
- Only if Bassong's header would not have reached the goal... (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 2, 17:24:14
- maybe it was that then (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:22:47
- The only Howson shot they have is the following: (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 2, 17:21:35
- i thought he shanked it way wide (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:20:51
- hence my lol - it was a bbc tweet - shocking journalism (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 2, 17:20:31
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 2, 17:18:58
- Howson, Martin, Seb, ..? (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 2, 17:20:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.