I think the only reason people would say that it should have been us is...

Because we probably could have beaten Villa and subsequently Bradford - not because we are worried about not being quite at the same level of progress as Swansea?

Posted By: Dog on February 24th 2013 at 14:20:19

Message Thread

before all the 'shouls have been us' posters start on about swans v bradford, can i just.. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 24, 14:05:14
- also the win yesterday - late goals - rest from cup matches beneficial? (NCFC) - Dirty Delia, Feb 24, 14:52:18
- Not really, because we would be in Bradford's position, not Swansea's. (NCFC) - Dog, Feb 24, 14:08:32
  - Ummm (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 24, 14:11:17
    - Well we wouldn't be going into a final as overwhelming favourites. (NCFC) - Dog, Feb 24, 14:13:34
      - no..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 24, 14:16:50
        
        I think the only reason people would say that it should have been us is... (NCFC) - Dog, Feb 24, 14:20:19
        
        Hmmmppppphhh (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 24, 14:24:11
        
        well agreed, but once in the Prem, Cups become more important (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 24, 14:29:21
        
        I think staying in the Prem for us is more important... (n/m) (NCFC) - Astroturf, Feb 24, 14:32:26
        
        Absolutely, because teams are incapable of playing 2 competitions in this day and age (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 24, 14:36:24
        
        ..........and we're there!! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 24, 15:00:58
        
        Worked for Birmingham.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Astroturf, Feb 24, 14:59:18
        
        Correlation does not imply causation (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 24, 15:02:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.