I particularly liked #5

"Can a juror come to a verdict based on a reason that was not presented in court and has no facts or evidence to support it either from the prosecution or defence?"

ie, "I wasn't really paying attention but Googlefight says 'Vicky Pryce Not Guilty' narrowly beats 'Vicky Pryce Guilty'. Can I use that?"

Quite clearly a good number of them have been surfing the web to read about the trial and were wanting to base their decision on something they read off of on Twitter!

Posted By: CWC on February 20th 2013 at 23:30:23

Message Thread

Vicky Pryce trial (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 20, 22:31:24
- I won't divulge how I know this but (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 20, 23:15:38
  - Have to say the only time I've done it, everyone took it very seriously. Respect to (General Chat) - woody, Feb 20, 23:24:38
    - Honest and fair, agree. Well done to her (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 20, 23:58:11
  - suspect that happens more often than not (General Chat) - CWC, Feb 20, 23:19:40
    - You're probably right (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 21, 00:01:05
    - That's SCC! (n/m) (General Chat) - woody, Feb 20, 23:22:02
      - Hang SCC?? (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 20, 23:58:43
- What is "reasonable doubt" (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 20, 23:07:17
  - I particularly liked #5 (General Chat) - CWC, Feb 20, 23:30:23
    - They should be held in contempt (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 21, 00:03:12
- Staggering... (General Chat) - woody, Feb 20, 23:01:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.